In Reply to: Re: If only you knew what you were talking about posted by xenon101 on January 14, 2002 at 07:47:58:
Please be advised that we don’t search the justifications of what cameras we own but are talking about the genetic concepts. In the best possible scenario a person should not own any camera but rent it upon the specific necessity and specific requirements.The owning the amount of the deterrent cameras doesn’t put you in a position to reflect the Reality. The question is: what you do with those cameras. Giving to the fact that you can’t recognize the different between Canon’s and Nikon’s optics (an particularly at 70s-80s) indicates that you do not do a lot. From the different prospective don’t take me overly anal-retentive: for a normal application they both are fine cameras.
Yes, some models of Hasselblad's bodies are assembled by Fuji. A friend of mine who imports Hasselblads made very fascinating research and find the Fuji’s Hasselblads are better assembled then Sweden. Isn’t it ironic?
Regarding the Films and digital: there is a lot of more to it.
I really do not know why decided to argue about it. My intentions were not to bring the “digital quality†in my statement (though I stay behind to what I said) but to colorize the message.
*** Final question, what is "AF constriction"? The AF is getting smaller?
I was referring to the fact that the Canon Ultrasonic Line has fundamentally different constriction with all Nikon lenses. Nikon has a mechanical devise with transmits a moment from a motor within a camera to the lenses to set a focus. Canon Ultrasonic lenses receive an electrical command from a camera and have the engine locally to perform the spin. (Actually the lens' component itself is a rotor, I find it very intelligent!) This lead to the fact that all Ultrasonic Canon lenses are order of magnitude faster then the Nikon’s lenses. Frankly speaking, the only this fact would made me to love them.
Regards,
Romy the CaT
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Unfortunately I nave no luxury do not know. - Romy 23:42:37 01/14/02 (19)
- Here's 'da low down - xenon101 06:02:44 01/15/02 (18)
- Re: Here's 'da low down - Romy 19:38:58 01/15/02 (4)
- The "decisive moment"? - xenon101 06:11:05 01/17/02 (3)
- Re: The "decisive moment"? - Romy 11:00:30 01/17/02 (2)
- Reality... - xenon101 09:13:49 01/18/02 (1)
- Re: Reality... - Romy 09:47:03 01/18/02 (0)
- Guys, guys... - jj 13:38:05 01/15/02 (12)
- Re: Guys, guys... - xenon101 16:37:22 01/15/02 (11)
- Minolta indeed... - jj 10:55:01 01/16/02 (8)
- Minolta experience... - xenon101 05:47:26 01/17/02 (7)
- Re: Minolta experience... - Romy 14:50:21 01/17/02 (6)
- Re: Minolta experience... - xenon101 17:50:52 01/17/02 (5)
- Re: Minolta experience... - Romy 18:53:36 01/17/02 (3)
- Kodachrome - xenon101 06:21:31 01/18/02 (2)
- Re: Kodachrome - Romy 09:14:52 01/18/02 (1)
- Re: Kodachrome - xenon101 06:08:29 01/21/02 (0)
- Re: Minolta experience... - Romy 18:41:36 01/17/02 (0)
- Re: Guys, guys... - Romy 20:05:59 01/15/02 (1)
- You seem to be under the illusion - jj 11:00:52 01/16/02 (0)