|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
12.72.246.186
'); } // End --> |
In Reply to: Generally speaking... posted by R Browne on February 15, 2005 at 22:42:18:
I have a Leica R-6.2 camera which I have been using for close studio work using the only lens I have for it, a Macro Elmarit-R 60mm. f/2.8 lens. I have decided to broaden it's use by getting a 50mm. lens for outdoors. The Summicron-R 50mm. f/2 seems the most ideal and is the most compact of the lenses which I had in mind. Of course, being budget conscience, I was seeking a used one. The local Leica dealer didn't have any used Summicron-R 50mm. at this time but only had new ones. He did have a used, but pristine appearing Summilux-R 50mm. f/1.4, the lastest of three verisons with an E60 filter mount which he would sell me for about the same price as the new Summicron. New, these Summilux lens cost more then twice the price of a Summicron. They are heavier, bulkier, and a lot more glass. Some of the internet reviewers have said that they are the best lenses available and other reviewers have said the Summicron's are better, so at this time I'm confused wheather to keep the Summilux, which I'm trying out now, or get the new Summicron, which was my original intention. I will end up paying about the same price. If you are an experienced Leica user, what is your opinion?
Follow Ups:
I'm not familiar with the Summilux-R but I do have a 20 year old Summicron-R that I haven't used in a very long time. I think it comes down to this: Do you need the extra stop of speed the Summilux-R will give you? If so, there's your choice. If not, consider the Summicron-R and save yourself some money and weight. Sorry I can't give you a more personally informed opinion. A quick web search finds Erwin Puts' opinion that the current Summilux-R slightly edges out the Summicron-R. YMMV.
| ||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: