Wine Asylum

Huh?

131.107.0.74

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Thread: Display All Email ] [ Wine Asylum ]

real_jj

(M)

In Reply to: Re: Wine vs. audio. posted by hexenboden on April 4, 2006 at 16:37:40:

Did you say "phallacy"? You meant fallacy? I haven't seen the diatribe myself, but there have been many uninformed attacks (and some misinformed/misinforming attacks) as well on blind testing.
Now, a blind test does not have to be quick, sudden, or immediate. Subjects in many blind tests have as much time as they need to listen and decide.

Follow Ups:

Re: Huh? - hexenboden 18:20:12 04/04/06 (0)
Yes, fallacy. Maybe I was thinking about something else... ;)
I conceptually love the idea of a blind test, but I have to admit an extended blind test may be problematic. It would not be impossible to set up but expensive.
In any event, I think all this bosh about blind tests being ineffective for subjective reasons is pure bosh written to appease the subjectivist manufacturers. Read the John Atkinson thread and get a load of bosh dumped on you...
Revel (Madrigal/Mark Levinson) has a great facility or speaker blind testing. There's a company I respect.

http://www.audioasylum.com/forums/whine/messages/8258.html

Post a Followup:

Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password (What's this?) Eat Me
E-Mail:
Subject:

Message:	(Posts are subject to Content Rules)

Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
E-mail Replies:	Automagically notify you when someone responds.

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Thread: Display All Email ] [ Wine Asylum ] [ Comment ] [ Delete ] [ Copyright Warning! Click for Details ]

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Schiit Audio