Shutterbug Strasse

A photographer's haven for the lastest in digital or traditional film cameras.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

Re: and the Rockets Red Glare..................230 years

Posted by jerryjg on July 6, 2006 at 17:01:41:
I'm not impressed. Why did you have to photshop that? Obviously you werent at the launch site a 4am in the morning, so you got the image off a website..and to top it all off, you photoshopped the image to make some kind of montage.IN my estimation, this is the prime example of anti-digtal photgraphy. I am not oppsed to digital photography per-se. That is, in the hands of an experienced photagrapher who at least knows how to use a Pentax K1000. What i am seeing is very poor photogaraphy, without the slighest inclination towards a tradtional realistic image, but spalttered all over the screen as digital"art". Go get a penatx K1000. Spend 6 months takin images , and then come back and give us some digital photos without the phootshop crutch.