Home
AudioAsylum Trader
Shutterbug Strasse

A photographer's haven for the lastest in digital or traditional film cameras.

For Sale Ads

FAQ / News / Events

 

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.

You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login


Login to access features only available to registered Asylum Inmates.
    By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username:

The Name that you picked or by default, your email.
Forgot Moniker?

 
 

Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".

Password:    

Forgot Password?

 Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:  
Your Email:  
Subject:  

Message Comments

   

Original Message

Difference between Nikon 105mm f2.8 AF Micro, & "D' version lens?

Posted by WoodyWW on February 20, 2006 at 10:10:19:

I did what research I could on this--apparently the non-D version 105mm f/2.8 AF Micro-Nikkor was made for a few years in the early '90's, then the current D model appeared, is that correct? Any sig. differences between the 2? They seem to go for about the same prices used, around $450, so would it be a mistake to buy the non-D version? I'd be using it with my D-50 for close-ups of small objects. I've also considered a 60mm f/2.8D AF Micro-Nikkor used or new. TIA for any advice!