Shutterbug Strasse

A photographer's haven for the lastest in digital or traditional film cameras.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

Re: Sacrilege????

Posted by Hornlover on April 8, 2004 at 12:28:34:
For a long time I poo poo'ed digital, having shot large format for many years. That was until I really experienced digital. I now shoot about 98% digital. I will never look back. As you have found, even 'consumer' digicams give great results. With the pro versions, with thier larger sensors, the results are incredible. I remember a few year back when the film guys kept saying it would take 18MP or some such number to equal 35mm. Then I would look at a D1 image (2.7MP) and see more detail than I could see in 35mm film, and then the D1x came out, and exceeded 35mm by a wide margin. The current crop of 6MP and higher pro cameras give better results than 35mm film ever did. Not only is it giving excellent images, but its better for the environment, and it has increased my profit margins. I love it!