Wine Asylum

The Wine Asylum, the leading Internet destination devoted to the enjoyment of wine.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

Re: Huh?

Posted by hexenboden on April 4, 2006 at 18:20:12:
Yes, fallacy. Maybe I was thinking about something else... ;)
I conceptually love the idea of a blind test, but I have to admit an extended blind test may be problematic. It would not be impossible to set up but expensive.
In any event, I think all this bosh about blind tests being ineffective for subjective reasons is pure bosh written to appease the subjectivist manufacturers. Read the John Atkinson thread and get a load of bosh dumped on you...
Revel (Madrigal/Mark Levinson) has a great facility or speaker blind testing. There's a company I respect.

http://www.audioasylum.com/forums/whine/messages/8258.html