Shutterbug Strasse

A photographer's haven for the lastest in digital or traditional film cameras.

Use this form to submit comments directly to the Asylum moderators for this forum. We're particularly interested in truly outstanding posts that might be added to our FAQs.
You may also use this form to provide feedback or to call attention to messages that may be in violation of our content rules.

You must login to use this feature.

Inmate Login

By default, logging in will set a session cookie that disappears when you close your browser. Clicking on the 'Remember my Moniker & Password' below will cause a permanent 'Login Cookie' to be set.

Moniker/Username: The Name that you picked or by default, your email. Forgot Moniker?	Examples "Rapper", "Bob W", "joe@aol.com".
Password:	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password ( What's this?)

If you don't have an Asylum Account, you can create one by clicking Here.

Our privacy policy can be reviewed by clicking Here.

Inmate Comments

From:
Your Email:
Subject:

Message Comments

Original Message

final observation ,lol

Posted by Musey on December 26, 2003 at 23:36:58:
Even if digital doesn't surpass film quality, the consumer will be duped into believing the contrary, just as what happend with vinyl and Compact-sound- DiscS.
ANd it's rather silly to argue which is better. Digital film and digital music both have their advantages and disadvantages. Both do certain things very well. Digital cameras are great for fast applications, such as photojournalism. Recording digital music is a breeze compared to analog. But when it comes to listening , analog gives bigger bang for the buck (and the ears, in most genres accept maybe Jazz) Comparisons could be made as nauseum, but the fact remains that both digital and analog will have their respective advantages and uses. Better to point out the merits of both rather than to try to argue one's alledged all-out superiority over the other. End of sermon.