|
Shutterbug Strasse A photographer's haven for the lastest in digital or traditional film cameras. |
|
|
|
Shutterbug Strasse A photographer's haven for the lastest in digital or traditional film cameras. |
|
In Reply to: Aps vs 35mm point and shoot posted by chaslieb on May 26, 2001 at 12:55:52:
APS negs are tiny, about 56% the size of 35mm. That's fine for full frame 4 x 7 prints or cropped 4 x 6 but the panoramic prints are too grainy for my taste, especially with 400 ISO film. Heck, 24 x 16 enlargements may pass as pointillistic art work. However, that Canon Elf sure is cute. I'd stick to 35mm if you have enlargements in your future.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Aps vs 35mm point and shoot - Gochugogi 00:40:11 05/28/01 (2)
- Re: Aps vs 35mm point and shoot - Monkey 15:01:24 08/20/02 (0)
- Re: Aps vs 35mm point and shoot - john c. 15:52:50 06/08/01 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
