|
Shutterbug Strasse A photographer's haven for the lastest in digital or traditional film cameras. |
|
|
|
Shutterbug Strasse A photographer's haven for the lastest in digital or traditional film cameras. |
|
In Reply to: Interpolation, does it degrade the image? posted by R B on April 21, 2001 at 05:47:20:
Rod,>>>...I know when I scan slides into the puter & try any interpolation it makes the image softer, less sharp. Why would any serious photographer want a camera that claims an interpolated mega pixel?<<<
Personally, internal interpolation is B-A-D bad! If i wanted to play around to add FAKE resolution/pixels there are software solutions that will most probably do a much better job than the internal built-in camera solutions. IMHO the camera should simply have the ability to do a 1:1 output of the CCD/CMOS to whatever imaging software package you desire. THEN let us humans with software at our disposal to manipulate from there. Kodak has LONG been using interpolation BTW...
>>> Is it the small amount 5.4mp to 5.9mp that makes it acceptable?<<<
NO interpolation is acceptable IMHO as it generally seems to be used for the MARKETING GUYS to wave their flag about "high resolution numbers" versus TRUE photographic benefits.
Just my humble 2 yen.
Enjoy the music,
Steven R. Rochlin
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Interpolation BAD... (more) - Steven R. Rochlin 09:40:14 04/26/01 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
