Difference between Nikon 105mm f2.8 AF Micro, & "D' version lens?

Shutterbug Strasse

A photographer's haven for the lastest in digital or traditional film cameras.

I did what research I could on this--apparently the non-D version 105mm f/2.8 AF Micro-Nikkor was made for a few years in the early '90's, then the current D model appeared, is that correct? Any sig. differences between the 2? They seem to go for about the same prices used, around $450, so would it be a mistake to buy the non-D version? I'd be using it with my D-50 for close-ups of small objects. I've also considered a 60mm f/2.8D AF Micro-Nikkor used or new. TIA for any advice!

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Parts Connexion

Topic - Difference between Nikon 105mm f2.8 AF Micro, & "D' version lens? - WoodyWW 10:10:19 02/20/06 (3)

Thanks for the advice.....I bought a used 60mm f/2.8D AF Micro-Nikkor for - WoodyWW 17:49:04 03/14/06 (0)

Remember because of the smaller sensor in digi's a 60 macro becomes a 90mm, and 105 becomes 157.5mm- I love my 60 f2.8 - Joe M 09:26:23 02/27/06 (0)

Re: Difference between Nikon 105mm f2.8 AF Micro, & "D' version lens? - Doc B. 07:27:44 02/22/06 (0)

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?

Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
	Remember my Moniker & Password (What's this?) Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:

Message:	(Posts are subject to Content Rules)

Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:	Automagically notify you when someone responds.

To view your new posting or follow-up, click on the RELOAD or REFRESH button on your browser.