Here is a question for you. How many of you think that the traditional camera is that best medium for photography?Do you feel that the Digital cameras are OK but some how are missing something? [Like a lower price tag for one].
I compared two cameras, one digital and the other a traditional SLR. The Digital camera was $1300 while the traditional camera is $400. Let’s face it, optics and a good camera body are one of those things where you get what you pay for. However I can buy and process a lot of film for $900.
What do you think?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Digital -VS- Traditional - Van 08:15:40 04/21/01 (14)
- Re: Digital -VS- Traditional - SamM 16:03:55 11/20/01 (0)
- Re: Digital -VS- Traditional - john c. 15:14:58 05/12/01 (0)
- Re: Digital -VS- Traditional - Vinylly 23:12:41 04/30/01 (0)
- Um, for what? - jj 21:44:45 04/21/01 (3)
- Ahh yes but there is always Photo Shop - Van 22:26:44 04/21/01 (2)
- Tips on PS - R B 08:34:11 04/26/01 (0)
- Well, yes... I've used it on my scanned film images - jj 00:38:05 04/23/01 (0)
- Traditional inaccuracy. - Romy 16:05:16 04/21/01 (0)
- Re: Digital -VS- Traditional - Keith 14:14:45 04/21/01 (5)
- Re: Digital -VS- Traditional - Van 20:02:09 04/21/01 (4)
- The choice is yours... (more) - Steven R. Rochlin 21:55:54 04/21/01 (3)
- Well put. - Van 22:16:07 04/21/01 (2)
- Thanks Van... (more) - Steven R. Rochlin 06:10:03 04/22/01 (1)
- Re: Thanks Van... (more) - Van 11:50:50 04/22/01 (0)