Shutterbug Strasse

Re: resolution vs. quality

66.81.71.214

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Thread:  Display  All  Email  Next ] [ Shutterbug Strasse ]

I own a 1.3 megapixel Vivitar. It's large and uses 4 AA batteries, definitely not state of the art. But - the lens is excellent with very low distortion and large glass area, the autofocus works vary well (it has no zoom) and the light metering is just about optimal.
I recently bought el-cheapo 3.3 megapixel camera that's small and light, but when it comes to quality of picture for posting on the web, I find that the higher resolution buys me nothing, since I always reduce the size of the image files to acceptable levels, and that would require reducing the resolution anyway.
I end up going back to the old trusty Vivitar...
Of course, if I'd paid $400 for the new camera then probably it would have benn closer in optical quality to the Vivitar. But I recall you saying a "cheap camera"...
So my advice is to look for the features you need, not just the megapixel or bells and whistles that you don't.


Follow Ups:


Post a Followup:

  Register / Login
Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):   Forgot Password?
  Remember my Moniker & Password  (What's this?)   Eat Me
E-Mail:
Subject:
Message:   (Posts are subject to Content Rules)
Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
E-mail Replies:   Automagically notify you when someone responds.


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Thread:  Display  All  Email  Next ] [ Shutterbug Strasse ]
[ Comment ] [ Copyright Warning! Click for Details ]