|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
209.6.251.190
I did what research I could on this--apparently the non-D version 105mm f/2.8 AF Micro-Nikkor was made for a few years in the early '90's, then the current D model appeared, is that correct? Any sig. differences between the 2? They seem to go for about the same prices used, around $450, so would it be a mistake to buy the non-D version? I'd be using it with my D-50 for close-ups of small objects. I've also considered a 60mm f/2.8D AF Micro-Nikkor used or new. TIA for any advice!
Follow Ups:
for about $325. Maybe I should have bought a new one for $379, but anyway, I dig the Lens. And am glad I got the D version.
it is among the sharpest lenses ever made by anyone. At an effective length of 90 mm it is great for insect, Butterfly photos. To keep a safe distance from these skiddish subjects.
D type lenses are designed to work with the matrix metering feature in later Nikon bodies. The CPU in the later bodies uses the approximate focus distance info relayed by the D type lens to adjust the exposure time. If you are doing stills that allow you to take as many test shots as you need to get the exposure the way you want, it's not a particularly necessary feature. For that matter, neither is auto focus. I use an AI'd manual 55mm Micro on my D1 for my close work. You can pick them up for a song, and they are excellent lenses. However, I'm not sure if the D50 will meter with earlier manual lenses.
| ||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: