Shutterbug Strasse

Yeah but...

84.92.130.166

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Thread: Display All Email ] [ Shutterbug Strasse ]

jusbe

(A)

In Reply to: Here's The Review of the Kodak posted by ChetAtkinsDiet on March 18, 2005 at 07:25:19:

whilst I can agree with the reviewer in the article, the portrait is a typical example of what I find some Canons do to skin tones and tones in general: there is a bleaching effect that, for me, makes the image a less effective illusion of reality. The sensation of depth is flattened or made more shallow, and whilst the 'stippling' effect might be annoying on close inspection, I bet the flat-image rendition would bother me more. I have that already with my G3.
Is this to do with the way Canon's processors/light chips process detail or something else?
Big J.

Follow Ups:

Re: Yeah but... - ChetAtkinsDiet 11:51:37 03/25/05 (0)
This is the difference between shooting RAW and otherwise, prosumer SLR's and pro SLR's add at most minimal color correction and sharpening in camera- a shock to most p&s or consumer camera users. Shoot in raw and correct on your own later. I'd rather correct images to how I want them to look, not some guy who built the camera and configured the software.

Post a Followup:

Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):	Forgot Password?
	Remember my Moniker & Password (What's this?) Eat Me
E-Mail:
Subject:

Message:	(Posts are subject to Content Rules)

Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
E-mail Replies:	Automagically notify you when someone responds.

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Thread: Display All Email ] [ Shutterbug Strasse ] [ Comment ] [ Delete ] [ Copyright Warning! Click for Details ]

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Kimber Kable