Shutterbug Strasse

• SLR/n & SLR/c - Beaware 13:18:24 03/17/05 (7)
  In Reply to: Re: Look closer........they don't say but posted by jusbe on March 15, 2005 at 00:58:04:

  The SLR/n takes Nikon mount lenses, the SLR/c takes Canon mount lenses.
  
  

  ---

  • Here is a review of the kodak SLR/c - Joe M 10:00:58 03/18/05 (0)
    In Reply to: SLR/n & SLR/c posted by Beaware on March 17, 2005 at 13:18:24:

    For Canon lenses----------too bad I married Nikon for 30 years already.
    

    • http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/kodakslrc/   (Open in New Window)

    
    

    ---
  • Here's The Review of the Kodak - ChetAtkinsDiet 07:25:19 03/18/05 (4)
    In Reply to: SLR/n & SLR/c posted by Beaware on March 17, 2005 at 13:18:24:

    Wow, talk about unimpressive: http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/14n-initial.shtml

    time for Kodak to stick to the consumer market.
    
    

    ---

    • Re: Here's The Review of the Kodak - Snide-o-rama 13:00:49 03/21/05 (0)
      In Reply to: Here's The Review of the Kodak posted by ChetAtkinsDiet on March 18, 2005 at 07:25:19:

      The 14n and SLR/n aren't the same camera. The SLR/n is a big improvement over the 14n. Different sensor, different firmware, different body, etc. You need to look at the Kodak SLR forum at dpreview.com.

      It's still a bit of a speciality camera, really good in the studio and certain outdoor applications (landscapes).
      
      

      ---
    • Yeah but... - jusbe 15:50:54 03/18/05 (1)
      In Reply to: Here's The Review of the Kodak posted by ChetAtkinsDiet on March 18, 2005 at 07:25:19:

      whilst I can agree with the reviewer in the article, the portrait is a typical example of what I find some Canons do to skin tones and tones in general: there is a bleaching effect that, for me, makes the image a less effective illusion of reality. The sensation of depth is flattened or made more shallow, and whilst the 'stippling' effect might be annoying on close inspection, I bet the flat-image rendition would bother me more. I have that already with my G3.

      Is this to do with the way Canon's processors/light chips process detail or something else?
      

      Big J.

      
      
      

      ---

      • Re: Yeah but... - ChetAtkinsDiet 11:51:37 03/25/05 (0)
        In Reply to: Yeah but... posted by jusbe on March 18, 2005 at 15:50:54:

        This is the difference between shooting RAW and otherwise, prosumer SLR's and pro SLR's add at most minimal color correction and sharpening in camera- a shock to most p&s or consumer camera users. Shoot in raw and correct on your own later. I'd rather correct images to how I want them to look, not some guy who built the camera and configured the software.
        
        

        ---
    • That's a review of a Kodak - Doc B. 07:57:54 03/18/05 (0)
      In Reply to: Here's The Review of the Kodak posted by ChetAtkinsDiet on March 18, 2005 at 07:25:19:

      but I believe that the 14N is a different model than the SLR/n. I have a friend who is a photo gear reviewer, who expressed that while the 14N was a dog the SLR/n is really nice.

      In reading all these posts I am surprised that no one suggested that one might also want to consider a used pro digital SLR. I'm "stuck" with a bunch of older Nikkor prime lenses, so logic dictates that I should stay with Nikon. As an upgrade to my D1 I would look at a used D1X before I would consider, say, a new D100 kit at roughly the same money. I should think the same logic would apply to Canon gear. Spent a day last week taking some promo shots of a recording studio, and having used my D1 in the same room I felt that it would have stood up reasonably well to the 20D with an adapted 21mm Leitz lens we were using, at least for the kind of staged, long exposure low ISO hot lit shots we were taking. All this said, if I didn't have a bunch of Nikkor lenses and I was going to go out and start fresh, I would sure consider the Canon DSLR offerings as well. The 20D is quite impressive.
      
      

      ---
  • Figures. Thanks! -t - jusbe 05:00:39 03/18/05 (0)
    In Reply to: SLR/n & SLR/c posted by Beaware on March 17, 2005 at 13:18:24:

    
    

    Big J.

    
    
    

    ---

Post a Followup:

Moniker (Username): Password (Optional):   Forgot Password?   Remember my Moniker & Password  (What's this?)   Eat Me E-Mail: Subject:

Message:   (Posts are subject to Content Rules) Optional Link URL: Optional Link Title: Optional Image URL: E-mail Replies:   Automagically notify you when someone responds.

---

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Thread:  Display  All  Email ] [ Shutterbug Strasse ] [ Comment ] [ Delete ] [ Copyright Warning! Click for Details ]

---

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

McShane Design

---

[ Top of Page ] [ Contact Us ] [ Support/Wish List ] [ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]

---

[ General ] [ Speakers ] [ Tubes ] [ Vinyl ] [ Digital ] [ Hi-Rez ] [ Video Asylum ] [ Cables ] [ Tweaks/DIY ] [ Music ] [ Films ]

---