|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
In Reply to: I prefer the New International to read. posted by dennzio on June 15, 2004 at 19:32:35:
But it reads like a, oh, a Japanese VHS manual. Lifeless prose,
specific and clear to be sure, but flat and lifeless. The Son of Man
comes off as, well, uninteresting. Read "Paradise Lost"; the KJV is
engrained in the text. Let's do a comparison, a collation if you will:The last clause of Ephesians 6, 12:
KJV: "against spiritual wickedness in high places."
NIV: "against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realm."
Which seems to you the most, uh, poetic? The most bang for your buck?
The most passionate? The most steeped in implication, even steeped
in meaning? Regards,
Follow Ups:
From a perspective of efforting to understand the Bible, the NIV is easier to read and understand, in todays modern English language. I do agree with you that the KJV is the more poetic of the two, if that is what you want.
""From a perspective of efforting to understand the Bible, the NIV is easier to read and understand, in todays modern English language.""
Maybe it takes some extra effort, but itīs worth it. And old forms of language are closer to the true meaning of words. And then, thereīs that thing about left brain vs right brain, which poetic language jumps over so easily, going straight to the core of things...Regards
But you missed mine. I read the Bible for inspiration rather than
information. Regards,
nt
When you tire of being a simpleton, take some peyote or mushrooms.
Open your eyes. Another point of view, personally experienced, can
do wonders for tedious petulance. Regards,J.R.
nt
Register / Login |
| ||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: