In Reply to: Re: Good heavens, we agree on something... posted by Greg Ewing on December 13, 2002 at 10:33:23:
It can't be just being digital. (resolution maybe? or ordered rows of pixels versus the random lay of color dots in film?) I use a slide/film scanner on my 35 mm slides and negatives, and the pictures I'm getting don't look "digital". Yet the scan process certainly is digital. And sure, I play with the file in a photo processing program. But you really need to do that to digital camera files, too. I don't think we're quite to the point of printing right off the camera. Although the latest photo printers are now claiming automatic post processing (like the Fuji machine down at Walmart does, I guess)for color and contrast.
Follow Ups:
You can not post to an archived thread.
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright Warning! Click for Details ]