that is REEEAAL bad
and me personnally i don't think dig is quite up to snuff just yet, sure is hella useful though, but to get the same image quality as any half decent film camera you have to really step up with big dough. I mean i could replace my current outfit for like 400(beans 2nd hand in the great white north) maybe and to get a similar picture (res, depth, etc. etc.) in dig is gonna cost me over 1000 (eg:g2) esspecially since i can't get it seccond hand yet. Once similar image quality and features are available at competing prices then film will be moving out quick except for the types who want to get creative with the chemicals. Though my above statements don't really take into account the mass adoption of digital cameras.
partly asside, i think it's rediculous the way medium format digital backs are of bassically no use to anyone but studio photographers. The Sigma SD-9 with FOVEON is about where i'd like to get into digital.
